On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:14:11PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 11 May 2016, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > Similar to preadv and pwritev, preadv2 and pwritev2 need compat entries > > in the 32-bit syscall table. > > So this is 2016 and we added a syscalls which require compat support. What's > wrong here?
I'm not sure I understand your question, it looks to me as "why do we add syscalls that require compat support". If that's what you are asking, I have no idea, I'm a strace man. -- ldv
