Am Mittwoch, den 11.05.2016, 12:34 +0200 schrieb Philipp Zabel: > Hi Masahiro, > > Am Mittwoch, den 11.05.2016, 11:52 +0900 schrieb Masahiro Yamada: > > Hi Philipp, > > > > > > 2016-05-10 21:25 GMT+09:00 Philipp Zabel <p.za...@pengutronix.de>: > > > Hi Masahiro, > > > > > > Am Dienstag, den 10.05.2016, 18:50 +0900 schrieb Masahiro Yamada: > > >> This series is just for review. > > >> Please do not apply this patch. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com> > > > > > > No need for all these tiny drivers. If you probe from DT as Lee > > > requests, you can let of_device_id.data point to a compatible specific > > > uniphier_reset_data. > > > > > > > I will need to fill the table a bit more to complete this work, > > but I do not think this reset driver will become as big as the clk driver. > > (I guess it will be less than 1000 lines.) > > > > If you prefer a single file for the whole of this SoC family, > > I can squash all the files into one. > > (I can split it if I need to do so in the future.) > > I'm fine with split files if you think the complete lists are too long, > but in that case export the uniphier_reset_data
"... and use them from a single platform driver." I wanted to add here before I tripped over the send button. > I don't care about the lists being in a single file so much as I'd > prefer to avoid the duplicated boilerplate of one module_platform_driver > per SoC family member. best regards Philipp