* Zhao Lei <zhao...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > 1: Rewrite subject and changelog to fix typos and > make it more accurate.
So this is really annoying. In the previous review I suggested this: " - please fix the title of the patch: have a look at 'git log kernel/sched/cpuacct.c' how recent titles to that code look like. " If you do what I suggested, you see this title: sched/cpuacct: Check for NULL when using task_pt_regs() Yet you continued to submit using the tag I complained about: cpuacct: Show all detail stats in one file Yes, it's a small detail that I could fix up, but this kind of inability to read very plain suggestions worries me. And yes, if I look further, I see further signs of lack of care: In current code, we can get cpuacct data from severial files, severial? How about at least running a spell checker over the text? ... and I haven't even looked at the code. Thanks, Ingo