On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Mel Gorman wrote: > Because Andrew has made it pretty clear he will not take those patches on the > grounds of complexity - at least until it can be shown that they fix the e1000 > problem. Any improvement on the behavior of those patches such as address > biasing to allow memory hot-remove of the higher addresses makes them even > more complex.
What is the e1000 problem? Jumbo packet allocation via GFP_KERNEL? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
