On Wed, 11 May 2016, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote:
> Make execution of rotation a delayed_work that does a best effort
> to rotate __cqm_min_progress_rate pmonrs per-second in every package.
>
> Reviewed-by: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: David Carrillo-Cisneros <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/cqm.c | 70
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/x86/events/intel/cqm.h | 21 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/cqm.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/cqm.c
> index 203fc66..a61dd70 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/cqm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/cqm.c
> @@ -222,6 +222,8 @@ static int pkg_data_init_cpu(int cpu)
> mutex_init(&pkg_data->pkg_data_mutex);
> raw_spin_lock_init(&pkg_data->pkg_data_lock);
>
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(
> + &pkg_data->rotation_work, intel_cqm_rmid_rotation_work);
How's that supposed to compile? intel_cqm_rmid_rotation_work is defined below.
> +/*
> + * Schedule rotation and rmid's timed update in all packages.
> + * Reescheduling will stop when no longer needed.
> + */
> +static void intel_cqm_schedule_work_all_pkgs(void)
> +{
> + int pkg_id;
> +
> + cqm_pkg_id_for_each_online(pkg_id)
> + __intel_cqm_schedule_rotation_for_pkg(pkg_id);
That's going to make the NOHZ_FULL people very happy. NOT!
> @@ -1744,6 +1810,8 @@ static int intel_cqm_event_init(struct perf_event
> *event)
>
> mutex_unlock(&cqm_mutex);
>
> + intel_cqm_schedule_work_all_pkgs();
Why would you trigger rotation on each package if you just monitor a given
package?
Thanks,
tglx
