On 25/05/2016 04:16, Wanpeng Li wrote: > Ping Paolo or Peterz.
No need to ping, since Rik reviewed it 7 hours ago so the thread has gotten a bump in our mailboxes. And anyway this is the merge window, which is the most annoying time to get pings and one-patch changes. I don't mind at all getting large series during the merge window, but the small ones definitely can wait a week or two. Thanks, Paolo > 2016-05-25 3:22 GMT+08:00 Rik van Riel <[email protected]>: >> On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 20:27 +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote: >>> From: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]> >>> >>> This patch adds steal guest time support to full dynticks CPU >>> time accounting. After 'commit ff9a9b4c4334 ("sched, time: Switch >>> VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN to jiffy granularity")', time is jiffy >>> based sampling even if it's still listened to ring boundaries, so >>> steal_account_process_tick() is reused to account how much 'ticks' >>> are steal time after the last accumulation. >>> >>> Suggested-by: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Radim <[email protected]> >>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]> >> >> This also nicely fixes up f9c904b7613b ("sched/cputime: >> Fix steal_account_process_tick() to always return jiffies"), >> which relies on a bool function returning a certain number >> of jiffies :) >> >> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> >> >> -- >> All rights reversed > > >
