On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 4:07 AM, Enric Balletbo i Serra
<enric.balle...@collabora.com> wrote:
> Hi Benson, Olof
>
> On 26/05/16 03:59, Benson Leung wrote:
>> This reverts commit bff3c624dc7261a084a4d25a0b09c3fb0fec872a.
>>
>> Board "Leon" is otherwise known as "Toshiba CB35" and we already have
>> the entry that supports that board as of this commit :
>> 963cb6f platform/chrome: chromeos_laptop - Add Toshiba CB35 Touch
>>
>> Remove this duplicate.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <ble...@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_laptop.c | 15 ---------------
>>  1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_laptop.c 
>> b/drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_laptop.c
>> index 8398a7d..e8a44a9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_laptop.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_laptop.c
>> @@ -514,13 +514,6 @@ static struct chromeos_laptop cr48 = {
>>       },
>>  };
>>
>> -static struct chromeos_laptop leon = {
>> -     .i2c_peripherals = {
>> -             /* Touchpad. */
>> -             { .add = setup_cyapa_tp, I2C_ADAPTER_DESIGNWARE_0 },
>> -     },
>> -};
>> -
>>  #define _CBDD(board_) \
>>       .callback = chromeos_laptop_dmi_matched, \
>>       .driver_data = (void *)&board_
>> @@ -608,14 +601,6 @@ static struct dmi_system_id chromeos_laptop_dmi_table[] 
>> __initdata = {
>>               },
>>               _CBDD(cr48),
>>       },
>> -     {
>> -             .ident = "Leon",
>> -             .matches = {
>> -                     DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_VENDOR, "coreboot"),
>> -                     DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "Leon"),
>> -             },
>> -             _CBDD(leon),
>> -     },
>>       { }
>>  };
>>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(dmi, chromeos_laptop_dmi_table);
>>
>
> I think my patch is not applied in mainline yet, I'm not sure if Olof has the 
> patch in his working tree but in such case maybe he can simply remove the 
> patch instead of apply and then revert it?
>
> Just an opinion, thanks.

Yeah, good point. Done, even though it meant a full rebase right
before I send the pull request. :-/


-Olof

Reply via email to