On 06/02/2016 10:21 AM, Scott Branden wrote: > > > On 16-06-02 10:12 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >>> There is no need to add ARCH_BCM though? >> >> There are Makefile(s) with >> >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM) += bcm/ >> >> in drivers/pinctrl for example, maybe more, didn't check the whole tree. >> >> So without ARCH_BCM some drivers are dropped from the build ... > > I see that now. Quite bizarre how the NS2 pinctl driver (used on a > arm64 SoC) gets built right now.... > > Yes, adding the select with hidden option seems like what needs to be > done. The ARM Maintainers did not like multi-level ARCH_BCM being added > in the arm64 Kconfig previously so we dropped it.
We should always recusrse into that directory and build the respective pinctrl drivers within drivers/pinctrl/bcm, only for the enabled platforms, it makes no sense to have this kind of config symbol gating that. I can submit a patch doing just that unless somebody wants to do it as part of this patch series. -- Florian
