On 06/06/2016 04:47 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > It's identical to bar_init() now. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> > --- > I'm sorry for this 3/2 - I only now noticed that this additional > simplification is now possible.
I wonder whether we should also move content of read_dev_bar() into bar_init(). Especially given that it's not really reading a BAR but rather initializing the stashed value. -boris
