4.5-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>

commit e042d1ec4417981dfe9331e47b76f17929bc2ffe upstream.

btrfs_map_block can go horribly wrong in the face of fs corruption, lets agree
to not be assholes and panic at any possible chance things are all fucked up.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
[ removed type casts ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -5289,7 +5289,15 @@ static int __btrfs_map_block(struct btrf
        stripe_nr = div64_u64(stripe_nr, stripe_len);
 
        stripe_offset = stripe_nr * stripe_len;
-       BUG_ON(offset < stripe_offset);
+       if (offset < stripe_offset) {
+               btrfs_crit(fs_info, "stripe math has gone wrong, "
+                          "stripe_offset=%llu, offset=%llu, start=%llu, "
+                          "logical=%llu, stripe_len=%llu",
+                          stripe_offset, offset, em->start, logical,
+                          stripe_len);
+               free_extent_map(em);
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
 
        /* stripe_offset is the offset of this block in its stripe*/
        stripe_offset = offset - stripe_offset;
@@ -5528,7 +5536,13 @@ static int __btrfs_map_block(struct btrf
                                &stripe_index);
                mirror_num = stripe_index + 1;
        }
-       BUG_ON(stripe_index >= map->num_stripes);
+       if (stripe_index >= map->num_stripes) {
+               btrfs_crit(fs_info, "stripe index math went horribly wrong, "
+                          "got stripe_index=%u, num_stripes=%u",
+                          stripe_index, map->num_stripes);
+               ret = -EINVAL;
+               goto out;
+       }
 
        num_alloc_stripes = num_stripes;
        if (dev_replace_is_ongoing) {


Reply via email to