Hi Sinan,
Le 29/05/2016 à 00:01, Sinan Kaya a écrit :
> Open call is ignoring the return code from reset call and can
> potentially continue even though reset call failed.
> 
> If reset_required module parameter is set, this patch is going
> to validate the return code and will abort open if reset fails.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <ok...@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c 
> b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> index e87ceab..962cfb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> @@ -264,6 +264,8 @@ static int vfio_platform_open(void *device_data)
>       mutex_lock(&driver_lock);
>  
>       if (!vdev->refcnt) {
> +             const char *extra_dbg = NULL;
> +
>               ret = vfio_platform_regions_init(vdev);
>               if (ret)
>                       goto err_reg;
> @@ -272,7 +274,12 @@ static int vfio_platform_open(void *device_data)
>               if (ret)
>                       goto err_irq;
>  
> -             vfio_platform_call_reset(vdev, NULL);
> +             ret = vfio_platform_call_reset(vdev, &extra_dbg);
> +             if (ret && vdev->reset_required) {
> +                     dev_warn(vdev->device, "reset driver is required and 
> reset call failed in open (%d) %s\n",
> +                              ret, extra_dbg ? extra_dbg : "");
> +                     goto err_irq;
I am afraid you need to tear down the resources allocated by 
vfio_platform_irq_init. 

Best Regards

Eric
> +             }
>       }
>  
>       vdev->refcnt++;
> 

Reply via email to