On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 12:29:52PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > Let's take your example above and add that t0 should really be running > on cpu2/3 due to its utilization, assuming SD1[01] are little cpus and > SD1[23] are big cpus. In that case we would still do affine-wakeup and > stick the task on cpu0 despite it being a little cpu.
Ah indeed.
