Takashi Iwai wrote on 13.06.2016 10:20: > On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:07:48 +0200, > Borislav Petkov wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:22:17PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> > Hi! As announced last week in >> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2233992 >> > I'll try to write regression reports for 4.7. Find the first one below. >> looks good, thanks for volunteering. > Indeed, it's really appreciated!
thx! >> So I'm wondering, would it make more sense to have a web page somewhere >> which carries all those and gets updated when status ot any tracked >> regression changes? Yeah, that would be the good approach, but that would take some time and work to set up. > Another idea is to use "Keywords" or "Tags" field in each bugzilla > entry. Then you can let bugzilla showing up the all such entries. Which would mean that all regressions need to get an entry in bugzilla.kernel.org. I'm not sure if that's a wise approach, as some developers/subsystems don't use it afaics: some use other bug trackers, others just use mailing lists and might not be too happy if they'd have to deal with bugzilla. Obviously I could file tracking bugs in our bugzilla. But I wonder if that is worth the work; and it could lead to confusion once a regression reporter puts some crucial information into the tracking bug entry instead of posting it to the proper place where the developers discuss the problem. CU, knurd
