On Wed, Jun 15 2016, Prarit Bhargava <[email protected]> wrote: > At some point I was 100% sure this worked. I do remember testing it against > just a loadable module and had positive testing results.
I think the current %ps/%pf behaviour was introduced in 4796dd200db9 (way back in 2012). > In any case this is a trivial patch to add the functionality... Which I still think is broken and needlessly complicated. Please read my first reply again. Rasmus
