On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 06:03:15PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 06:48:56PM -0300, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote: > > On 06/07/2016 05:05 PM, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote: > > > On 06/07/2016 04:30 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > >> Is this something in mainline? This forces all task free path to be > > >> irq-safe, which *could* be fine but it's weird to make cgroup free > > >> path irq-safe for something which isn't in mainline. > > > > > > you mean, mainline linux kernel? if so, yes it is. I was running the > > > v4.7-rc2 from Linus, as is.... no external patches applied. > > > > > > > is there any other question/objection about this patch? > > Nope, I was just on vacation. Applied to cgroup/for-4.7-fixes.
Except that the patch seems to use irqsave/restore instead of plain irq ones in places. Care to update those? Thanks! -- tejun
