On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:52 PM, John Stultz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Deepa Dinamani <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:18 PM, John Stultz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Deepa Dinamani <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> time_to_tm() takes time_t as an argument. >>>> time_t is not y2038 safe. >>>> Add time64_to_tm() that takes time64_t as an argument >>>> which is y2038 safe. >>>> The plan is to eventually replace all calls to time_to_tm() >>>> by time64_to_tm(). >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: John Stultz <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> >>> >>> This looks sane to me. Are you hoping for me to queue this, or would >>> you like i to go though the fsdev maintainers with my ack? >>> >>> In either case. >>> >>> Acked-by: John Stultz <[email protected]> >> >> This is only used by the scsi fnic driver. >> I will separate these 2 patches from this CURRENT_TIME series and >> then both the patches can be merged through the respective trees. > > Sorry, this was not quite clear. I've gone ahead and queued this one > patch for testing, but let me know and I'll drop it if its going > through a different tree.
Ok.This works too. Thanks, Deepa
