Hi Jan,

> On Jun 21, 2016, at 14:22 , Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote:
> 
> On 2016-06-21 12:24, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>> 
>>> On Jun 21, 2016, at 13:13 , Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Pantelis,
>>> 
>>> coming back to this topic:
>>> 
>>> On 2016-06-09 08:03, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> OK, trial and error, and some interesting insights: I've played with DT
>>>> fragments and the overlay configfs patch of Pantelis [1] to have a
>>>> convenient start. Interestingly, I wasn't able to load a fragment that
>>>> followed the format specification for overlays ("Failed to resolve
>>>> tree"). By chance, I got this one working:
>>>> 
>>>> /dts-v1/;
>>>> / {
>>>>    fragment {
>>>>            target-path = "/soc@01c00000";
>>>>            __overlay__ {
>>>>                    #address-cells = <2>;
>>>>                    #size-cells = <2>;
>>>> 
>>>>                    vpci@0x2000000 {
>>>>                            compatible = "pci-host-cam-generic";
>>>>                            device_type = "pci";
>>>>                            #address-cells = <3>;
>>>>                            #size-cells = <2>;
>>>>                            reg = <0 0x2000000 0 0x1000000>;
>>>>                            ranges =
>>>>                                    <0x02000000 0x00 0x10000000 0x00 
>>>> 0x10000000 0x00 0x30000000>;
>>>>                    };
>>>>            };
>>>>    };
>>>> };
>>>> 
>>>> It successfully makes a BananaPi kernel add a pci host with the
>>>> specified config space and MMIO window.
>>>> 
>>>> [   81.619583] PCI host bridge /soc@01c00000/vpci@0x2000000 ranges:
>>>> [   81.619610]   No bus range found for /soc@01c00000/vpci@0x2000000, 
>>>> using [bus 00-ff]
>>>> [   81.619634]   MEM 0x10000000..0x3fffffff -> 0x10000000
>>>> [   81.620482] pci-host-generic 2000000.vpci: ECAM at [mem 
>>>> 0x02000000-0x02ffffff] for [bus 00-ff]
>>>> [   81.620779] pci-host-generic 2000000.vpci: PCI host bridge to bus 
>>>> 0000:00
>>>> [   81.620801] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
>>>> [   81.620814] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 
>>>> 0x10000000-0x3fffffff]
>>>> [   81.620851] PCI: bus0: Fast back to back transfers enabled
>>>> 
>>>> So, no /plugin/ statement, no phandles resolution. This format even
>>>> builds with the in-kernel dtc. Any explanations? Does the code make
>>>> sense (at least it builds without warnings)?
>>>> 
>>>> Now I need to back this with some code in Jailhouse.
>>> 
>>> Meanwhile I got a virtual PCI device recognized by Linux when running
>>> over Jailhouse. However, my hack above doesn't get me to proper
>>> interrupt mapping yet. This is what I was trying with upstream dtc:
>>> 
>>> /dts-v1/;
>>> / {
>>>     compatible = "lemaker,bananapi", "allwinner,sun7i-a20";
>>> 
>>>     fragment@0 {
>>>             target-path = "/soc@01c00000";
>>>             __overlay__ {
>>>                     #address-cells = <2>;
>>>                     #size-cells = <2>;
>>> 
>>>                     vpci@2000000 {
>>>                             compatible = "pci-host-ecam-generic";
>>>                             device_type = "pci";
>>>                             bus-range = <0 0>;
>>>                             #address-cells = <3>;
>>>                             #size-cells = <2>;
>>>                             #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>>>                             interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 0 7>;
>>>                             interrupt-map = <0 0 0 1 &gic 0 0 0 123 4>,
>>>                                             <0 0 0 2 &gic 0 0 0 124 4>,
>>>                                             <0 0 0 3 &gic 0 0 0 125 4>,
>>>                                             <0 0 0 4 &gic 0 0 0 126 4>;
>>>                             reg = <0 0x2000000 0 0x100000>;
>>>                             ranges =
>>>                                     <0x02000000 0x00 0x10000000 0x00 
>>> 0x10000000 0x00 0x30000000>;
>>>                     };
>>>             };
>>>     };
>>> 
>>>     gic: fragment@1 {
>>>             target-path = "/soc@01c00000/interrupt-controller@01c81000";
>>>             __overlay__ {
>>>             };
>>>     };
>>> };
>>> 
>> 
>> ^ This is not going to work: You need the reference to the real gic not the 
>> empty fragment
>> here that has a target there.
>> 
>> You need to compile with the correct dtc, and you also need to compile the 
>> base dts
>> with dtc too, using the -@ flag. You can hack around it by adding something 
>> like
>> 
>> __symbols__ {
>>      gic = "/soc@01c00000/interrupt-controller@01c81000”;
>> };
>> 
>> But you really need the __symbols__ node of the base dts generated by the 
>> dtc proper cause
>> the above is a dirty hack.
>> 
> 
> OK, re-building the kernel with DTC="/your/dtc -@", thus building the
> base dtb with symbols, fixes proper overlay format loading.
> 
> However, no luck yet with the interrupt topic - maybe a different issue.
> Digging deeper…
> 
Remove the gic: fragment and build both the kernel and the overlay with the -@ 
option.
That’s what makes it not to work.


> Thanks,
> Jan
> 
> -- 
> Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
> Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Reply via email to