On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 10:56 +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > > I think that would lead to some minor changes in behaviour in a few > corner cases, but I mainly wrote the patch as I thought it was very > confusing that we could have different "prev_cpu"s in different parts > of > the select_task_rq_fair() code path. > I agree that cleaning up the confusion is good.
-- All Rights Reversed.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
