On 20/06/2016 at 10:52:15 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote :
> +struct ac100_clk32k {
> +     struct clk_hw hw;
> +     struct regmap *regmap;
> +     u8 offset;
> +};
> +
> +#define to_ac100_clk32k(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct ac100_clk32k, hw)
> +
> +#define AC100_RTC_32K_NAME   "ac100-rtc-32k"
> +#define AC100_RTC_32K_RATE   32768
> +#define AC100_ADDA_4M_NAME   "ac100-adda-4M"
> +#define AC100_ADDA_4M_RATE   4000000
> +#define AC100_CLK32K_NUM     3
> +
> +static const char * const ac100_clk32k_names[] = {
> +     "ac100-clk32k-ap",
> +     "ac100-clk32k-bb",
> +     "ac100-clk32k-md",
> +};
> +

Well, naming things is hard but I don't feel ac100_clk32k and
ac100-clk32k are good prefixes for those clocks as they are actually
dividing a 32KHz or 4MHz clock (one configuration out of 128 is 32KHz).

Else, I don't have any objection.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Reply via email to