On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis <[email protected]> wrote: > > Al, what's the status here? This made it on my 4.7 regressions report > due to the "regression" keyword in the subject.
I don't think the tmpfs locking is going to get changed for 4.7. This
issue will likely only show up for some very specific microbenchmarks,
and the lockless next_positive one is likely too invasive for this
stage. So the problem is fixable, and not serious enough to worry
about for 4.7.
Linus
