On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 07:41:36 AM Baoquan He wrote:
> ACPI MADT has a 32-bit field providing lapic address at which
> each processor can access its lapic information. MADT also contains
> an optional entry to provide a 64-bit address to override the 32-bit
> one. However the current code does the lapic address override entry
> parsing twice. One is in early_acpi_boot_init() because AMD NUMA need
> get boot_cpu_id earlier. The other is in acpi_boot_init() which parses
> all MADT entries. The relevant log will be printed out twice too and
> this may confuse people.
> 
> So in this patch remove the repeated code in the 2nd part. Meanwhile
> add code comment above early_acpi_boot_init() to explain why its
> calling need be earlier, and print lapic override inforamtion like
> other MADT entry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> 
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
> Cc: Shaohua Li <[email protected]>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> Cc: Hidehiro Kawai <[email protected]>
> Cc: Juergen Gross <[email protected]>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
> Cc: Dave Young <[email protected]>
> Cc: Lv Zheng <[email protected]>
> Cc: Toshi Kani <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mark Salter <[email protected]>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 17 ++---------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup.c     |  3 +++
>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index 9414f84..6ef3694 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -274,6 +274,8 @@ acpi_parse_lapic_addr_ovr(struct acpi_subtable_header * 
> header,
>       if (BAD_MADT_ENTRY(lapic_addr_ovr, end))
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
> +     acpi_table_print_madt_entry(header);
> +
>       acpi_lapic_addr = lapic_addr_ovr->address;
>  
>       return 0;
> @@ -990,21 +992,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_madt_lapic_entries(void)
>       if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC))
>               return -ENODEV;
>  
> -     /*
> -      * Note that the LAPIC address is obtained from the MADT (32-bit value)
> -      * and (optionally) overridden by a LAPIC_ADDR_OVR entry (64-bit value).
> -      */
> -
> -     count = acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_LOCAL_APIC_OVERRIDE,
> -                                   acpi_parse_lapic_addr_ovr, 0);
> -     if (count < 0) {
> -             printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
> -                    "Error parsing LAPIC address override entry\n");
> -             return count;
> -     }
> -
> -     register_lapic_address(acpi_lapic_addr);
> -

I'm not really sure if this change is correct.

Does it only deal with the override?

>       count = acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_LOCAL_SAPIC,
>                                     acpi_parse_sapic, MAX_LOCAL_APIC);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> index 60078a6..504311c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> @@ -1799,7 +1799,7 @@ void __init register_lapic_address(unsigned long 
> address)
>       if (!x2apic_mode) {
>               set_fixmap_nocache(FIX_APIC_BASE, address);
>               apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "mapped APIC to %16lx (%16lx)\n",
> -                         APIC_BASE, mp_lapic_addr);
> +                         APIC_BASE, address);
>       }
>       if (boot_cpu_physical_apicid == -1U) {
>               boot_cpu_physical_apicid  = read_apic_id();
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index c4e7b39..059680d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -1157,6 +1157,9 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>        */
>       acpi_boot_table_init();
>  
> +     /*
> +      * AMD NUMA support need get boot_cpu_id earlier.
> +      */

Surely that's not the only goal of early_acpi_boot_init(), is it?

>       early_acpi_boot_init();
>  
>       initmem_init();
> 

Please CC ACPI-related patches to [email protected].

Thanks,
Rafael

Reply via email to