On Sun, 26 Jun 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]> > Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:25:43 +0200 > > Several update suggestions were taken into account > from static source code analysis. > > Markus Elfring (6): > twl-core: Return directly after a failed platform_device_alloc() > in add_numbered_child() > twl-core: Refactoring for add_numbered_child() > dm355evm_msp: Return directly after a failed platform_device_alloc() > in add_child() > dm355evm_msp: Refactoring for add_child() > smsc-ece1099: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation > in smsc_i2c_probe() > smsc-ece1099: Return directly after a function failure > in smsc_i2c_probe() > > drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c | 25 ++++++++++++------------- > drivers/mfd/smsc-ece1099.c | 11 ++++------- > drivers/mfd/twl-core.c | 28 +++++++++++++--------------- > 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
What is this set? A different but related one to the set you tagged it on to? Probably best not to do that. I now have a huge entangled thread in my inbox, which is going to become out of control rather quickly (if it isn't already). -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
