On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 05:52:33PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > and the rest (ie, except integrator, versatile and ixp4xx) has: > > > > config ARCH_SHARK > > bool "Shark" > > select PCI > > > > IOW, the "PCI support" question isn't offered for platforms which > > require PCI to be present, but is offered on platforms where it's > > optional. > > yeah. I think this also fits into the special-case i mentioned: it isnt > connected to something user-selectable, it's a side-effect of the first > 'feature selection' the user does: 'what platform do you compile your > kernel on'. As such it is a convenience group-selection. > > i.e. what we have behind this is still a clean tree of dependencies.
I agree 100% with that - since when that happens it's possible to traverse the tree to tell the user what's going on. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
