> Anyway, version 2 below uses LIFO for the accept() wakeups. This > appears to be a 5%-10% win for Apache. The browsing loop for > exclusive tasks will now pull in cachelines 0 and 2, rather > than the previous 0 and 1. That makes it much worse for the newest cpus which use 64byte lines (Athlon and PIV) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalabilit... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal ... dean gaudet
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal ... Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by remo... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by remo... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by ... dean gaudet
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalabilit... David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalab... dean gaudet
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by ... Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of ... dean gaudet
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_... dean gaudet