在 16/7/4 上午9:23, Yijing Wang 写道: > There is no return in continue_at(), update the documentation. >
Thanks. Acked-by: Coly Li <col...@suse.de> > Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyij...@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/md/bcache/closure.c | 2 +- > drivers/md/bcache/closure.h | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.c b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.c > index 9eaf1d6..864e673 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.c > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.c > @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ bool closure_wait(struct closure_waitlist *waitlist, > struct closure *cl) > EXPORT_SYMBOL(closure_wait); > > /** > - * closure_sync - sleep until a closure a closure has nothing left to wait on > + * closure_sync - sleep until a closure has nothing left to wait on > * > * Sleeps until the refcount hits 1 - the thread that's running the closure > owns > * the last refcount. > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h > index 782cc2c..9b2fe2d 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h > @@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ > * passing it, as you might expect, the function to run when nothing is > pending > * and the workqueue to run that function out of. > * > - * continue_at() also, critically, is a macro that returns the calling > function. > + * continue_at() also, critically, requires a 'return' immediately following > the > + * location where this macro is referenced, to return to the calling > function. > * There's good reason for this. > * > * To use safely closures asynchronously, they must always have a refcount > while > -- Coly Li
