Hi Paolo,
On 6/21/16 10:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 21/06/2016 15:50, Joerg Roedel wrote:
The code has a few style issues (thing I'd implemented differently), but
it looks functional. Anyway, before merging this the last 3 patches need
to be acked by the KVM maintainers.
Paolo?
I think patches 9 and 10 should be squashed because the code after patch
9 is only partly functional.
Likewise, I think this:
+
+ if (AMD_IOMMU_GUEST_IR_VAPIC(amd_iommu_guest_ir))
+ amd_iommu_irq_ops.capability |= (1 << IRQ_POSTING_CAP);
from patch 1 should be moved to patch 6.
I think you might have meant patch 7 instead of 6 since that is when we
enable vAPIC mode in the IOMMU.
Thanks,
Suravee
