On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, David Miller wrote: > > So the idea is to just run it to completion if it won't block and use > a fibril if it would?
That's not how the patches work right now, but yes, I at least personally think that it's something we should aim for (ie the interface shouldn't _require_ us to always wait for things even if perhaps an early implementation might make everything be delayed at first) Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/