Hi Stephen,
On jeu., juin 30 2016, Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> +
>> + spin_lock_init(&driver_data->lock);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_periph; i++) {
>> + struct clk *clk = driver_data->clk_data.clks[i];
>> +
>> + if (armada_3700_add_composite_clk(&data[i], parent_name, reg,
>> + &driver_data->lock, dev, clk))
>> + dev_err(dev, "Can't register periph clock %s\n",
>> + data[i].name);
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_onecell_get,
>> + &driver_data->clk_data);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_periph; i++)
>> + clk_unregister(driver_data->clk_data.clks[i]);
>
> It would be nice if we had devm_* registration in composite
> clks
>
This comment is the only one I didn't take into account in the second
version I've just sent. I agree it would be nice and I am willing to add
it. However these last days I was very busy with the birth of my last
child: I managed to find time to write this second version in time to be
merged for 4.8 but not enough to add these new function. I will try to
send a patch for it next week.
Thanks for your review,
Gregory
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
