On 07/10, Jorge Ramirez Ortiz wrote:
> On 9 July 2016 at 08:42, Jorge Ramirez <[email protected]>
> > um, I retested again this morning and it is all good - I was also a bit
> > surprised when things failed yesterday  (it seems one of the wires on my
> > board was loose, sorry).
> >
> > So AFAIC your patch addresses the issue in a much generic (better) way and
> > there are no regressions on a HiKey board running a 4.4 kernel.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Stephen, will you post your patch again? how do we progress the change set
> (ie your patch & the hikey device tree change)?

Yes I'll post it again today and put it in Russell's patch
tracker soon after that. I assume there isn't any concern with
the patch and it works for you so it would be good to have your
Tested-by too.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Reply via email to