On 07/11/2016 07:18 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 07/09/2016 11:05 AM, Janani Ravichandran wrote:
>> Currently, the mm_shrink_slab_start and mm_shrink_slab_end
>> tracepoints tell us how much time was spent in a shrinker, the number of
>> objects scanned, etc. But there is no information about the identity of
>> the shrinker. This patch enables the trace output to display names of
>> shrinkers.
>>
>> ---
>>  include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 10 ++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
>> index 0101ef3..be4c5b0 100644
>> --- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
>> +++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
>> @@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_start,
>>              cache_items, delta, total_scan),
>>
>>      TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> +            __field(char *, name)
>>              __field(struct shrinker *, shr)
>>              __field(void *, shrink)
>>              __field(int, nid)
>> @@ -202,6 +203,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_start,
>>      ),
>>
>>      TP_fast_assign(
>> +            __entry->name = shr->name;
>>              __entry->shr = shr;
>>              __entry->shrink = shr->scan_objects;
>>              __entry->nid = sc->nid;
>> @@ -214,7 +216,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_start,
>>              __entry->total_scan = total_scan;
>>      ),
>>
>> -    TP_printk("%pF %p: nid: %d objects to shrink %ld gfp_flags %s 
>> pgs_scanned %ld lru_pgs %ld cache items %ld delta %lld total_scan %ld",
>> +    TP_printk("name: %s %pF %p: nid: %d objects to shrink %ld gfp_flags %s 
>> pgs_scanned %ld lru_pgs %ld cache items %ld delta %lld total_scan %ld",
>> +            __entry->name,
> 
> Is this legal to do when printing is not done via the /sys ... file 
> itself, but raw data is collected and then printed by e.g. trace-cmd? 
> How can it possibly interpret the "char *" kernel pointer?

I actually had a similar patch set to this,  I was going to post it but Janani 
beat me to it ;-)

Vlastimil is correct,  I'll attach my patch below so you can see the 
difference.  Otherwise you won't get correct behavior passing through perf.   

I also have a patch which adds a similar latency script (python) but interfaces 
it into the perf script setup.

Tony

---

Pass shrinker name in shrink slab tracepoints

Signed-off-by: Tony Jones <to...@suse.de>
---
 include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
index 0101ef3..0a15948 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
 #define RECLAIM_WB_SYNC                0x0004u /* Unused, all reclaim async */
 #define RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC       0x0008u
 
+#define SHRINKER_NAME_LEN      (size_t)32
+
 #define show_reclaim_flags(flags)                              \
        (flags) ? __print_flags(flags, "|",                     \
                {RECLAIM_WB_ANON,       "RECLAIM_WB_ANON"},     \
@@ -190,6 +192,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_start,
 
        TP_STRUCT__entry(
                __field(struct shrinker *, shr)
+               __array(char, name, SHRINKER_NAME_LEN)
                __field(void *, shrink)
                __field(int, nid)
                __field(long, nr_objects_to_shrink)
@@ -203,6 +206,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_start,
 
        TP_fast_assign(
                __entry->shr = shr;
+               strlcpy(__entry->name, shr->name, SHRINKER_NAME_LEN);
                __entry->shrink = shr->scan_objects;
                __entry->nid = sc->nid;
                __entry->nr_objects_to_shrink = nr_objects_to_shrink;
@@ -214,9 +218,10 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_start,
                __entry->total_scan = total_scan;
        ),
 
-       TP_printk("%pF %p: nid: %d objects to shrink %ld gfp_flags %s 
pgs_scanned %ld lru_pgs %ld cache items %ld delta %lld total_scan %ld",
+       TP_printk("%pF %p(%s): nid: %d objects to shrink %ld gfp_flags %s 
pgs_scanned %ld lru_pgs %ld cache items %ld delta %lld total_scan %ld",
                __entry->shrink,
                __entry->shr,
+               __entry->name,
                __entry->nid,
                __entry->nr_objects_to_shrink,
                show_gfp_flags(__entry->gfp_flags),
@@ -236,6 +241,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_end,
 
        TP_STRUCT__entry(
                __field(struct shrinker *, shr)
+               __array(char, name, SHRINKER_NAME_LEN)
                __field(int, nid)
                __field(void *, shrink)
                __field(long, unused_scan)
@@ -246,6 +252,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_end,
 
        TP_fast_assign(
                __entry->shr = shr;
+               strlcpy(__entry->name, shr->name, SHRINKER_NAME_LEN);
                __entry->nid = nid;
                __entry->shrink = shr->scan_objects;
                __entry->unused_scan = unused_scan_cnt;
@@ -254,9 +261,10 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_end,
                __entry->total_scan = total_scan;
        ),
 
-       TP_printk("%pF %p: nid: %d unused scan count %ld new scan count %ld 
total_scan %ld last shrinker return val %d",
+       TP_printk("%pF %p(%s): nid: %d unused scan count %ld new scan count %ld 
total_scan %ld last shrinker return val %d",
                __entry->shrink,
                __entry->shr,
+               __entry->name,
                __entry->nid,
                __entry->unused_scan,
                __entry->new_scan,


Reply via email to