Alan wrote:
--- linux.vanilla-2.6.20-rc6-mm3/drivers/ata/pata_amd.c 2007-01-31 
14:20:10.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc6-mm3/drivers/ata/pata_amd.c 2007-02-06 17:04:19.000000000 
+0000
@@ -642,6 +642,11 @@
        if (type == 1 && rev > 0x7)
                type = 2;
+#if defined(CONFIG_ATA_ACPI)
+       /* Prefer the ACPI driver for Nvidia hardware */
+       if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA && ata_pata_acpi_present(pdev))
+               return -ENODEV;
+#endif         
        /* Check for AMD7411 */
        if (type == 3)
                /* FIFO is broken */

Problem with this approach is it may break distro/initrd setups since the pata_amd driver appears to be the one that "should" work based on the PCI ID, so the initrd would end up containing only this driver, which will fail out with -ENODEV and cause a boot failure. If the root filesystem was on a disk driven by this controller, the mkinitrd stuff would have to "know" that it should also try loading pata_acpi.

Unless there are some Nvidia boxes out there which don't provide _GTM/_STM ACPI methods (which seems a bit unlikely given Allen Martin's comments) then we could potentially move the Nvidia PATA PCI IDs into the pata_acpi driver, at least if ACPI is enabled in the kernel build..

--
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to