Hi Masahiro,

Am Donnerstag, den 21.07.2016, 14:06 +0900 schrieb Masahiro Yamada:
> This has been inconsistent; some returns -EINVAL, some -ENOTSUPP.
> Make it consistent in this header, in favor of -ENOTSUPP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>
> ---
> 
>  include/linux/reset.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/reset.h b/include/linux/reset.h
> index 5894f0f..c875b4b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/reset.h
> +++ b/include/linux/reset.h
> @@ -71,14 +71,14 @@ static inline struct reset_control 
> *__of_reset_control_get(
>                                       struct device_node *node,
>                                       const char *id, int index, int shared)
>  {
> -     return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +     return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
>  }
>  
>  static inline struct reset_control *__devm_reset_control_get(
>                                       struct device *dev,
>                                       const char *id, int index, int shared)
>  {
> -     return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +     return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
>  }
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER */

Thanks, this has already been changed in commit 168d7c4e8bb2 ("reset:
Return -ENOTSUPP when not configured").

regards
Philipp


Reply via email to