Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> writes: >> Adding a license here implies we accept that it's actually GPLv2 >> compatible. And IANAL. > > Note, at least lawyer has signed off on this. > > I'd like to see Richard do so as well.
Sure, but as I said before I'm not applying it until we have accepted in-tree code which needs it. If there's consensus that the kernel needs to accept YA license, I will abide by it as module maintainer. But I won't endorse it myself. Thanks, Rusty.
