On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 07:12:19PM -0700, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> +struct ns_common *ns_get_owner(struct ns_common *ns)
> +{
> + …
> + return &get_user_ns(user_ns)->ns;
> +}Is there a reason to return the generic ‘struct ns_common *’ here instead of ‘struct user_namespace *’? The current use case doesn't need access to the additional information, but future ng_get_owner callers might, and we know the returned namespace (if any) will be a user namespace. Cheers, Trevor -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
