3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Vladimir Davydov <[email protected]>

commit 69828dce7af2cb6d08ef5a03de687d422fb7ec1f upstream.

Sending SI_TKILL from rt_[tg]sigqueueinfo was deprecated, so now we issue
a warning on the first attempt of doing it.  We use WARN_ON_ONCE, which is
not informative and, what is worse, taints the kernel, making the trinity
syscall fuzzer complain false-positively from time to time.

It does not look like we need this warning at all, because the behaviour
changed quite a long time ago (2.6.39), and if an application relies on
the old API, it gets EPERM anyway and can issue a warning by itself.

So let us zap the warning in kernel.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 kernel/signal.c |   14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -3004,11 +3004,9 @@ static int do_rt_sigqueueinfo(pid_t pid,
         * Nor can they impersonate a kill()/tgkill(), which adds source info.
         */
        if ((info->si_code >= 0 || info->si_code == SI_TKILL) &&
-           (task_pid_vnr(current) != pid)) {
-               /* We used to allow any < 0 si_code */
-               WARN_ON_ONCE(info->si_code < 0);
+           (task_pid_vnr(current) != pid))
                return -EPERM;
-       }
+
        info->si_signo = sig;
 
        /* POSIX.1b doesn't mention process groups.  */
@@ -3053,12 +3051,10 @@ static int do_rt_tgsigqueueinfo(pid_t tg
        /* Not even root can pretend to send signals from the kernel.
         * Nor can they impersonate a kill()/tgkill(), which adds source info.
         */
-       if (((info->si_code >= 0 || info->si_code == SI_TKILL)) &&
-           (task_pid_vnr(current) != pid)) {
-               /* We used to allow any < 0 si_code */
-               WARN_ON_ONCE(info->si_code < 0);
+       if ((info->si_code >= 0 || info->si_code == SI_TKILL) &&
+           (task_pid_vnr(current) != pid))
                return -EPERM;
-       }
+
        info->si_signo = sig;
 
        return do_send_specific(tgid, pid, sig, info);


Reply via email to