Hello, On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 05:25:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Yeah, that was one of the early approaches. The issue isn't limited > > to wq. Any memory allocation can have similar issues of underlying > > node association changing and we don't have any synchronization > > mechanism around it. It doesn't make any sense to make NUMA > > association dynamic when the consumer surface is vastly larger and > > there's nothing inherently dynamic about the association itself. > > And other architectures?
No idea but it only matters for NUMA + CPU hotplug combination where a whole node can go empty, which would at most be a few archs. Thanks. -- tejun
