On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.c...@samsung.com> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On 2016년 07월 27일 11:09, Chris Zhong wrote: >> Hi Guernter >> >> On 07/27/2016 09:44 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> Hi Chris, >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Chris Zhong <z...@rock-chips.com> wrote: >>> >>> [ ... ] >>> >>>>> > + >>>>> > +/* Properties of EXTCON_TYPE_DISP. */ >>>>> > +#define EXTCON_PROP_DISP_MIN 150 >>>>> > +#define EXTCON_PROP_DISP_MAX 150 >>>>> > +#define EXTCON_PROP_DISP_CNT (EXTCON_PROP_DISP_MAX - >>>>> EXTCON_PROP_DISP_MIN) >>>>> >>>>> + 1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ok. >>>> >>>> Tested with these "+1", it works for my DP patch. >>>> >>> You should be able to use >>> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/363623/1 as baseline (if >>> you didn't do that already). >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Guenter >> >> Thanks Guenter, and I saw this bug has fixed in extcon-test branch. >> >> > > Do you test it with extcon_set_property_capability()? > And if you test this patch-es, could you send the tested-by tag for these > patches? >
For my part I did. Above link is public, so you should be able to see the complete patch set which uses the new API from drivers/extcon/extcon-cros_ec.c. I'll re-test tomorrow with the updated patches from your test branch. > I'll send the next version after a few days. Great. Thanks, Guenter