Am Mittwoch, 27. Juli 2016, 11:42:38 CEST schrieb David Howells: Hi David,
> x86_64 needs to use compat_sys_keyctl for 32-bit userspace rather than > calling sys_keyctl. The latter will work in a lot of cases, thereby hiding > the issue. > > Reported-by: Stephan Mueller <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]> Tested-by: Stephan Mueller <[email protected]> > cc: [email protected] > --- > > arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl > b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl index 4cddd17153fb..f848572169ea > 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl > @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ > # 285 sys_setaltroot > 286 i386 add_key sys_add_key > 287 i386 request_key sys_request_key > -288 i386 keyctl sys_keyctl > +288 i386 keyctl sys_keyctl > compat_sys_keyctl > 289 i386 ioprio_set sys_ioprio_set > 290 i386 ioprio_get sys_ioprio_get > 291 i386 inotify_init sys_inotify_init Ciao Stephan
