On 27/07/16 04:11, Salah Triki wrote:
> The only caller of befs_find_brun_direct is befs_fblock2brun, which
> already validates that the block is within the range of direct blocks.
> So remove the duplicate validation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.tr...@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Luis de Bethencourt <lui...@osg.samsung.com>
> ---
> fs/befs/datastream.c | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/befs/datastream.c b/fs/befs/datastream.c
> index 26cc417..e224b9a 100644
> --- a/fs/befs/datastream.c
> +++ b/fs/befs/datastream.c
> @@ -249,17 +249,9 @@ befs_find_brun_direct(struct super_block *sb, const
> befs_data_stream *data,
> int i;
> const befs_block_run *array = data->direct;
> befs_blocknr_t sum;
> - befs_blocknr_t max_block =
> - data->max_direct_range >> BEFS_SB(sb)->block_shift;
>
> befs_debug(sb, "---> %s, find %lu", __func__, (unsigned long)blockno);
>
> - if (blockno > max_block) {
> - befs_error(sb, "%s passed block outside of direct region",
> - __func__);
> - return BEFS_ERR;
> - }
> -
> for (i = 0, sum = 0; i < BEFS_NUM_DIRECT_BLOCKS;
> sum += array[i].len, i++) {
> if (blockno >= sum && blockno < sum + (array[i].len)) {
>
Hi,
I have applied 1, 2 and 3 from this series into:
https://github.com/luisbg/linux-befs/tree/befs-next
I had already tested and acked the 3 commits above. Having them in the above git
branch [0] makes it easier to see the order of all recent commits.
Andrew,
I hope this process works for you. If not, let me know and I can adapt to
however
you prefer it to be.
Thanks Salah :)
Luis
[0] reason for that git branch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/26/533
