Before, signoff was not checked if the filename is '-', indicating
reading the patch from stdin.  This causes commands such as below not to
warn about a missing signoff.

  git show --pretty=email | scripts/checkpatch.pl -

As a workaround, the command could be modified to refer to stdin by a
name other than '-'.  The workaround is not an elegant solution, because
elsewhere checkpatch uses the fact that filename equals '-' is special
for stdin, such as setting '$vname' to 'Your patch'.

  git show --pretty=email | scripts/checkpatch.pl /dev/stdin

This change causes checkpatch to check for a missing signoff line, even
if the filename is '-', as in the first variation of the command.

Signed-off-by: Allen Hubbe <[email protected]>
---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 4904ced676d4..83acbac10705 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -6045,7 +6045,7 @@ sub process {
                ERROR("NOT_UNIFIED_DIFF",
                      "Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch\n");
        }
-       if ($is_patch && $filename ne '-' && $chk_signoff && $signoff == 0) {
+       if ($is_patch && $chk_signoff && $signoff == 0) {
                ERROR("MISSING_SIGN_OFF",
                      "Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)\n");
        }
-- 
2.9.1

Reply via email to