On Tue, Jul 26 2016 at 04:05:17 PM, Robin Murphy <[email protected]> wrote:
> +     if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED)
> +             prot |= IOMMU_PRIV;
> +
>
> then drop the rest of the changes to the switch statement below. It's
> taken me an embarrassingly long time to work out why things were blowing
> up in __iommu_sync_single_for_device() all with a VA of phys_to_virt(0) ;)

Ah yes, that is much nicer!  Nice catch...

> With that change, for the whole series:
>
> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
>
> I guess at this point it may be worth waiting to repost based on -rc1.
> Be sure to CC patch 5 to Vinod as the current dmaengine maintainer, as
> it's his ack we'll need on that.

Thanks for the review and test.  I'll go ahead and send a v5 series
since I'm actually leaving QuIC this Friday and so I won't be around to
send it next week...


-Mitch

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Reply via email to