On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:43:24AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > Similar to the new optional 'i2c-bus' subnode from Jon Hunter, this > adds an optional 'i2c-mux' subnode, for similar reasons. I.e. it is > bad of the i2c mux core to assume that any subnode of an i2c mux device > is a potential (when the 'reg' property matches) i2c-mux child bus, > given that i2c mux devices might do more than mux i2c traffic. > > So, if an 'i2c-mux' subnode is present, dictate that all i2c-mux child > buses exist beneath that subnode. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <[email protected]> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux.txt | 23 > ++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
