I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/dma/pch_dma.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/pch_dma.c b/drivers/dma/pch_dma.c
index 113605f..6dd47e3 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/pch_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/pch_dma.c
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
 #define DMA_MASK_CTL2_MODE     0x00003333
 
 static unsigned int init_nr_desc_per_channel = 64;
-module_param(init_nr_desc_per_channel, uint, 0644);
+module_param(init_nr_desc_per_channel, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | 
S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(init_nr_desc_per_channel,
                 "initial descriptors per channel (default: 64)");
 
-- 
2.9.2

Reply via email to