I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]> --- drivers/media/pci/bt8xx/bt878.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/bt8xx/bt878.c b/drivers/media/pci/bt8xx/bt878.c index 8aa7266..a0778ee 100644 --- a/drivers/media/pci/bt8xx/bt878.c +++ b/drivers/media/pci/bt8xx/bt878.c @@ -53,10 +53,10 @@ static unsigned int bt878_verbose = 1; static unsigned int bt878_debug; -module_param_named(verbose, bt878_verbose, int, 0444); +module_param_named(verbose, bt878_verbose, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(verbose, "verbose startup messages, default is 1 (yes)"); -module_param_named(debug, bt878_debug, int, 0644); +module_param_named(debug, bt878_debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Turn on/off debugging, default is 0 (off)."); int bt878_num; -- 2.9.2
