On 02/08/16 13:50, Baole Ni wrote: > I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value > when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. > As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the > corresponding macro, > and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, > thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. > > Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com>
This is the worst series of lkml spam I've ever received! 1. Make something like this a series in one thread, not 1285 single threads! Add a cover letter. 2. Don't write one patch per source file, one per subsystem is enough. Maybe even better: make a tree-wide patch using Coccinelle. 3. Use better subjects. I want to see the subsystem the patch is modifying. 4. Use _correct_ maintainers. WTF do I have to do with pcmcia? Juergen
