I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com>
---
 net/core/netpoll.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index 94acfc8..fac805d 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static void zap_completion_queue(void);
 static void netpoll_async_cleanup(struct work_struct *work);
 
 static unsigned int carrier_timeout = 4;
-module_param(carrier_timeout, uint, 0644);
+module_param(carrier_timeout, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 
 #define np_info(np, fmt, ...)                          \
        pr_info("%s: " fmt, np->name, ##__VA_ARGS__)
-- 
2.9.2

Reply via email to