2016-08-02 20:22 GMT+08:00 Radim Krčmář <[email protected]>: > 2016-08-02 19:39+0800, Wanpeng Li: >> 2016-07-13 4:09 GMT+08:00 Radim Krčmář <[email protected]>: >> [...] >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c >>> @@ -152,14 +152,22 @@ static void recalculate_apic_map(struct kvm *kvm) >>> struct kvm_apic_map *new, *old = NULL; >>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; >>> int i; >>> - >>> - new = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kvm_apic_map), GFP_KERNEL); >>> + u32 max_id = 255; >> >> If this should be max_id = KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID? I have a patch on hand to >> fix it, but I didn't know whether it is your desired behavior or not. > > No, we could just have static array then. KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID is expected > to be raised to INT_MAX and eventually UINT_MAX, so it would not be > practical. The dynamic array is there to avoid wasting space in the > common case, where VMs have only low APIC IDs. > > Inintial patches had 255 to minimize a chance of regressions as the > static array was that big, but starting with max_id = 0 is our goal and > should be ok even without other changes.
I see, thanks. :) Regards, Wanpeng Li
