I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]> --- drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-lib.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-lib.c b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-lib.c index 1b80621..9a375de 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-lib.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-lib.c @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ out: EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(speedstep_get_freqs); #ifdef CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_RELAXED_CAP_CHECK -module_param(relaxed_check, int, 0444); +module_param(relaxed_check, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(relaxed_check, "Don't do all checks for speedstep capability."); #endif -- 2.9.2
