I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]>
---
 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
index eb4f5f2..1dfb4bc 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
@@ -7636,5 +7636,5 @@ void l2cap_exit(void)
        l2cap_cleanup_sockets();
 }
 
-module_param(disable_ertm, bool, 0644);
+module_param(disable_ertm, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_ertm, "Disable enhanced retransmission mode");
-- 
2.9.2

Reply via email to