I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c 
b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
index 0fb27d3..843c3d12 100644
--- a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
+++ b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
 #define DRIVER_NAME "mspro_block"
 
 static int major;
-module_param(major, int, 0644);
+module_param(major, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 
 #define MSPRO_BLOCK_MAX_SEGS  32
 #define MSPRO_BLOCK_MAX_PAGES ((2 << 16) - 1)
-- 
2.9.2

Reply via email to